3
VWAP tiers read in order — monthly, weekly, daily
7
Instruments covered — indices, metals, energy, FX
H1–H4
Setups graded by conviction, each with its own invalidation
01 / IDENTITY
The identity stays hidden. The track record doesn't. Judge the work, not the face behind it.
02 / METHOD
No signals to blindly copy. The full framework — VWAP tiers, zones, setups — is taught, not hidden. Not a strategy to buy once and not a video course to finish — a process applied fresh, every session, in front of you.
03 / CONSISTENCY
This is a long game. Every hypothesis, win or lose, is logged and left in the record.
THE FRAMEWORK
Three layers, applied the same way every single session.
H1–H4
Setup Tiers
A graded table of setups from highest to lowest conviction — every hypothesis is tagged so you know exactly what it's betting on.
MM/HF
VWAP Analysis
Daily, intraday, MM and HF VWAP tiers mapped against price to read where size is sitting.
S/D
Supply & Demand Zones
Market-profile composites define the zones — every entry, target and invalidation is drawn from them.
Retail charting stops at price and an indicator. This starts one level up — structural context across three timeframes — and only then narrows to an entry. See it applied below, including a session where it didn't work.
{{ shotCounter }}
‹
›
{{ shot.caption }}
Members also get How to read a hypothesis — what each tier is actually telling you, why a zone qualifies as one, how the composite reveals where size is positioned, and the point at which a hypothesis is invalid.
THE JOURNAL
Every hypothesis, logged before the open. Nothing edited after the fact.
{{ mockCounter }}
‹
›
{{ mock.instrument }}
{{ mock.date }}
{{ mock.bias }}
{{ mock.rezim }}
{{ mock.setup }}
{{ v.label }}
{{ v.text }}
SUPPLY ZONES
{{ mock.supply }}
DEMAND ZONES
{{ mock.demand }}
DELTA / ORDER FLOW
{{ mock.delta }}
{{ mock.note }}
STRUCTURAL BIAS ACROSS TIERS
TIER
VWAP
SPOT
READ
{{ r.tier }}
{{ r.vwap }}
{{ r.pos }}
{{ r.read }}
{{ mock.summary }}
KEY LEVELS
Supply: {{ mock.levelsSupply }}
Demand: {{ mock.levelsDemand }}
HYPOTHESES
#
TYPE
THESIS
ENTRY
TARGETS
INVALIDATION
{{ s.n }}
{{ s.side }}
{{ s.thesis }}
{{ s.entry }}
{{ s.targets }}
{{ s.inval }}
DECISION TREE — RTH OPEN
—{{ line }}
SIZING
{{ mock.sizing }}
THE PATH
Most traders are not short of information. They are short of a process they trust enough to repeat.
Screens, groups and feeds all compete for the same attention, and most of them are noise dressed as urgency. The cost is not the money lost on a bad trade. It is the years spent starting over with a new system every few months.
What follows is the sequence members are asked to work through. It is deliberately slow at the start, because the habit is the asset. Nothing here promises a return. It promises a way of working you can still be using in three years.
This sequence is the default for building the habit, not a rule for everyone. If you already read VWAP and market-profile composites and understand where money managers and hedge funds sit relative to them, there's no reason to spend a month watching from the sidelines — apply the framework at the pace your own experience supports. What stays constant regardless of starting point is the discipline underneath it: read all three tiers before sizing conviction, trade the setup the structure actually gives you, and let the habit compound rather than reinventing the process every week.
WEEK ONE
Read, don't trade
Open the morning hypothesis next to your own chart and follow the session without acting on it. The only question that week is whether the three tiers actually describe how the day unfolded. Most people find they do, and that is what makes the rest worth the effort.
WEEKS TWO TO FOUR
One instrument, your own read
Pick a single instrument and write your own tier read each morning before opening the published one. Then compare. The gap between the two is the entire curriculum, and it closes faster than people expect once they see it written down.
MONTH TWO
Primary setup only
Trade the primary setup and ignore the rest. The counter-trend entries are the ones that break discipline first, and they are not where a foundation gets built. Fewer, better-aligned trades is the whole of the improvement at this stage.
MONTH THREE ONWARD
You write the hypothesis
By this point the published hypothesis becomes a second opinion rather than an instruction. That is the intended end state. A member who no longer needs the daily post is not a lost subscriber, they are the reason the journal exists.
WHAT GROWTH LOOKS LIKE HERE
It is measurable long before it is profitable. Fewer trades taken outside the framework. Fewer sessions opened without a written plan. Less time spent hunting for a reason to be in the market. Those move first, and the account follows them, not the other way around.
WHAT IS DELIBERATELY MISSING
One page each morning across seven instruments. No alerts to react to, no calls to act, nothing to keep up with. The room stays small on purpose. What has been removed matters as much as what gets published, because attention is the scarce resource in this job.
THE COMMUNITY
A free Telegram room to see how the desk operates. The full journal and daily hypotheses stay behind membership.
No hype channel, no pump calls. Short market comments posted in the open room; the full daily hypotheses and journal stay in the paid journal.
Join the free room
CASE STUDIES
The morning read, and how the session actually resolved.
Same three-tier read as above, on real sessions. The read below is quoted from the journal entry exactly as it was published. Left is the screen it was written from, before the open; right is the same screen after the session. One of these did not work, and it is here for the same reason the others are.
{{ kase.instrument }}
{{ kase.date }}
{{ kase.bias }}
{{ kase.setup }}
{{ kase.verdict }}
THE READ, BEFORE THE OPEN
{{ r.k }}
{{ r.v }}
HOW IT RESOLVED
{{ kase.outcome }}
{{ kase.lesson }}
BEFORE — {{ kase.beforeTime }}
AFTER — {{ kase.afterTime }}
Click either screen to open it full size. The setup table, entries, targets and sizing that went with this read stay in the members' journal.
SAMPLE — JOURNAL
Ten real entries from the archive.
Bias, regime and setup, logged before the session — the same format used in the members-only daily journal.
Today's hypotheses are in the members-only journal.
These 10 are archive samples. New entries are logged daily, before the session opens.
MEMBERSHIP
One access tier. Pay monthly or save on the year.
No signal tiers, no upsells. Every member gets the same journal, the same methodology, the same room.
START HERE
MONTHLY
€15 / month
Billed monthly. Cancel anytime.
Start monthly
— Daily trading hypotheses
— Full journal, H1–H4 setup table
— VWAP tier + supply/demand analysis
— Full methodology & framework
— Private member room
ANNUAL · save 17%
€149 / year
Billed once a year. ~€12.40/month.
Start annual
— Daily trading hypotheses
— Full journal, H1–H4 setup table
— VWAP tier + supply/demand analysis
— Full methodology & framework
— Private member room
WHAT €15 IS BEING COMPARED TO
Not to a winning trade — to the cost of another month spent rotating between indicators with no consistent process. €15 is what it takes to find out in four weeks whether this read fits how you think about a market. Staying in that chaos has no such price tag, which is exactly why it's expensive.
BEFORE YOU COMMIT TO A YEAR
Take the monthly first. A month is long enough to see whether the framework fits how you read a market, and cancelling costs nothing. Move to annual once you know it does. That order is recommended deliberately, because the annual plan is not refunded on a change of mind — the material is disclosed in full the moment you get access, and there is no way to un-read it. Anything that goes wrong on the technical side, or a genuine problem with the service, is dealt with individually. Write to contact@rentez.eu before subscribing if you want a straight answer about whether this suits you.
NOTES
These are trading hypotheses shared for educational purposes, not financial advice or signals to copy. Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past entries in the journal do not guarantee future results.
FAQ
Before you ask in email.
{{ item.q }}
{{ item.a }}
Still have a question?
On-topic, specific questions only — no live chat or phone support. Sent to {{ contactEmailAddr }}.
{{ contactBtnLabel }}
{{ contactStatus }}
ABOUT
Why the name stays off the page.
The author's real likeness — the face is deliberately kept hidden.
Rentez publishes one person's daily trading hypotheses and journal. The identity behind it stays private — partly for regulatory caution around publicly identifying as an individual trader, and partly because trading meaningful size in futures and FX takes a level of focus that public visibility works against.
The methodology is built on real market data: executed transactions, order flow, and market-profile distributions, used as a proxy for where participants operating on different time horizons — money managers, hedge funds — may be active, read through VWAP. It doesn't rely on lagging indicators or other backward-looking technical tools.
The tier framework builds on established institutional order-flow concepts — VWAP-based positioning read across timeframes, market-profile composites — taught across several trading education programs. The specific interpretation, setup grading and daily journal format here are the author's own, developed and refined over years of live application.
These hypotheses were written privately for years before any of this existed — they are the working notes that keep the author's own execution consistent. The decision to start publishing them came from a simple thought: the framework helps, and there is no reason to keep it to one desk.
This is an educational project, not a signal service. The goal is to help members build their own long-term, rules-based habit — some will scalp the same hypothesis, others will hold for days on a larger risk-reward ratio. The information is supplementary; how it's applied is up to each trader, and results will differ from member to member.
There's no live-commented trading and no phone or chat support. Both add distractions that work against consistent execution of real size, and against keeping this sustainable alongside a personal life. Specific questions are welcome directly by email.
If a bad course or a loud community already cost you money and trust, that caution is earned, not a flaw to fix. This is built for exactly that kind of scrutiny — read the sample journal, check the timestamps, and decide with evidence instead of a pitch.
This isn't for everyone. Membership can be cancelled at any time, and nothing here should be read as a guarantee of results — only as a documented, probability-based approach to reading the market.
MISSION
Help independent traders replace reactive decisions with a documented, falsifiable and repeatable market process.
A WORKING CODE
We prepare before the move.
We state what would prove us wrong.
We audit before we celebrate.
We share mistakes without hiding them.
Process outranks any single outcome.
Rentez — identity withheld, method disclosed.
Operated and billed by WELLINGTON TRADE LTD, Company Number 09748800. Educational content only — not investment advice.
Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · contact@rentez.eu
Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · contact@rentez.eu